SKU: 8359478609

Modern Science: The Trojan Horse of Occultism

Sale price$26.95 Regular price$29.95
Save 10%

Pay in installments of $7.49 with ShopPay, AfterPay and Klarna

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Aug 7 - Aug 12

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

Modern Science: The Trojan Horse of OccultismThe Royal Society of London was the first epistemological cartel to really make that leap into the legitimization of Scientism, including pedagogy on Evolutionary Biology, Heliocentrism, Gravitational Theory, The Copernican Principle, Astronomy, and Natural Science. Though most of their Natural Science endeavors were anchored in Babylonian Hermeticism, Alchemical Magick, and the Rosicrucianism of Sir Francis Bacon, they were able to mask these

The Royal Society of London was the first epistemological cartel to really make that leap into the legitimization of Scientism, including pedagogy on Evolutionary Biology, Heliocentrism, Gravitational Theory, The Copernican Principle, Astronomy, and Natural Science. Though most of their ÒNatural ScienceÓ endeavors were anchored in Babylonian Hermeticism, Alchemical Magick, and the Rosicrucianism of Sir Francis Bacon, they were able to mask these underpinnings by rebranding their pedagogy as empirical science, thereby establishing the foundations of modern science as a Trojan Horse for occultism, resulting in the start of long legacy of epistemological front groups such as The Vatican Jesuits, The Freemasons, and The Illuminati, all of which who would further disseminate The Royal SocietyÕs occult doctrines behind the same banner of so-called, Òlegitimate empirical scienceÓ.

Merely look at what they were teaching:

The Copernican Principle
Heliocentrism
Gravity
Evolutionary Theory
An Expanding Universe
Astrophysics,
Astronomy

For all their preaching of the merits of the scientific method, everything they taught, and currently do teach, is anchored in occult fantasy, which was cleverly repackaged as legitimate material science. The Royal Society was the perfect subterfuge and Trojan Horse for advancing their occult agendas and ideas under the radar. On the surface, The Royal Society sought to realize Sir Francis Bacon's vision of experimental science as a collective activity undertaken for the good of The State. However, Bacon's connection to the Rosicrucians and the Freemasons has been widely discussed by authors and scholars in many books.

Andreas Sommer, in his article in PSI Encyclopedia, says this about the Òscientific revolutionÓ of the 16th Êand 17th Centuries:

ÒThe scientific revolution of the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries Ð represented by pioneers such as Francis Bacon, Johannes Kepler, Galileo, Robert Boyle and Isaac Newton Ð is often considered to have liberated humanity from religious oppression and superstition. It was at this time, one commentator writes, that modern notions of Ôa sharp distinction between normal and paranormal, between science and pseudoscience, reality and magicÕ began to form, and ever since, these boundaries have Ôdivided parapsychology from conventional scienceÕ.

Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 8359478609

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.4 ★★★★★
Based on 14 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
S
Verified Purchase
Sigrid Inger
New York, US
★★★★★ 5
Much much better than the standard sock
Size: X-Large, Color: (001) Black / Black / Castlerock
These socks are superb. Lots of padding in the right places, snug where it should be snug & loose where you don't want it to bind. They are marked with an 'L' for left foot, & 'R' for the right foot (it makes a difference in the fit being perfect. They stay up on your heel & don't slide down
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 20, 2026
C
Verified Purchase
Chris
Los Angeles, US
★★★★★ 4
4 lefts vs 2 rights
Size: Medium, Color: (001) Black / Black / Castlerock, Size: Medium, Color: (001) Black / Black / Castlerock
I ordered a set of three. I ended up with four left socks and two right socks lol. Granted it doesn’t matter unless you’re OCD. JEEZ. Love the socks but not the attention to detail the sock company did on matching left/right marked socks.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 28, 2026
J
Verified Purchase
Jill
Lexington, US
★★★★★ 5
My favorite socks
Size: Medium, Color: (001) Black / Black / Castlerock
I love love, love the left and right socks one has an L one has an R and they fit so well and they’re so comfy for running jogging or walking. They are my favorite socks.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 8, 2026
V
Verified Purchase
vbgirlfla
Dallas, US
★★★★★ 5
Hold up to tough wear - definitely recommend
Size: X-Large, Color: (001) Black / Black / Castlerock
These are my teens favorite socks. We've ordered multiple sets. Given that he tends to wear then as slippers I am really impressed with how they hold up. The extra large size is great for bigger feet. They wash well and I didn't notice any shrinkage, fading or pilling. This set is going to college with him.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 1, 2026
J
Verified Purchase
Jana
Natrona Heights, US
★★★★★ 5
Good quality
Size: Large, Color: (400) Royal / White / Mod Gray
To big! I am female size 9 and Amazon was recommending for me size L. Yes, my socks is wearing my boyfriend. I need to buy smaller size
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on October 13, 2025

recommand products