pedali favero assioma pro mx 2 misuratore di potenza doppio
SKU: 90796483021

pedali favero assioma pro mx 2 misuratore di potenza doppio

Sale price$324.80 Regular price$360.89
Save 10%

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 5 - Jul 10

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

pedali favero assioma pro mx 2 misuratore di potenza doppioLeistungsmesser fr MTB und Gravel mit Leistungssensor an beiden Pedalen. Fr echte Messungen an rechter und linker Beinseite. Das Produkt Assioma PRO MX ist der revolutionre Leistungsmesser Pedal fr MTB und Gravel, 100 % SPD kompatibel. Kann sowohl mit den mitgelieferten Cleats als auch mit den originalen Shimano SM SH51 verwendet werden. Es erbt die Zuverlssigkeit und extreme Przision der Favero Straen Leistungsmesser Pedale und integriert eine

Leistungsmesser für MTB und Gravel mit Leistungssensor an beiden Pedalen. Für echte Messungen an rechter und linker Beinseite.

Das Produkt

Assioma PRO MX ist der revolutionäre Leistungsmesser-Pedal für MTB und Gravel, 100 % SPD®-kompatibel.

Kann sowohl mit den mitgelieferten Cleats als auch mit den originalen Shimano® SM-SH51 verwendet werden.

Es erbt die Zuverlässigkeit und extreme Präzision der Favero Straßen-Leistungsmesser-Pedale und integriert eine unvergleichliche Stoßfestigkeit und Widerstandsfähigkeit für Trail-Herausforderungen.

Einfach zu montieren und universell kompatibel

Die Leistungsmesser-Pedale Favero Assioma PRO MX-2 lassen sich wie jedes andere Pedal anbringen und von einem Fahrrad zum anderen wechseln: in wenigen Minuten, ohne spezielles Werkzeug und ohne Mechanikerhilfe.

Dank der Integration von Bluetooth und ANT+ sind sie zudem mit den meisten Fahrradcomputern und Smartwatches auf dem Markt sowie mit den wichtigsten Trainings-Apps wie Zwift, Strava, Bkool, TrainerRoad, Rouvy und vielen anderen kompatibel.

Eine kompakte Achse zum Schutz der Technologie

Alle elektronischen Komponenten und die integrierte wiederaufladbare Batterie sind vollständig in einer äußerst kompakten und widerstandsfähigen Achse eingeschlossen.

Dank der strategischen Position der wiederaufladbaren Batterie und dem Fehlen äußerer elektrischer Kontakte werden unangenehme Aussetzer durch die Batterie vermieden, wie sie bei austauschbaren Batterien typisch sind. Außerdem können ohne Batteriefächer oder -klappen kein Wasser, Schlamm oder Staub eindringen, was auch bei widrigen Wetterbedingungen höchste Zuverlässigkeit garantiert.

Das Produkt ist nach IP67 zertifiziert.

Ultrawiderstandsfähig gegen Stöße und Einschläge

Das Pedalgehäuse aus Aluminium 6061-T6 ist extrem robust und ultraleicht, bereit für die anspruchsvollsten Gelände.
Das Befestigungssystem hat eine Oberflächenhärte von bis zu 800 HV, was eine bisher unerreichte Stoßfestigkeit bei einem Leistungsmesser am Pedal garantiert.

Das IAV Power System und die von Assioma PRO MX-2 gemessenen Daten

Dank des speziellen IAV Power Systems berücksichtigen die Messungen von Assioma unsere unregelmäßigen Tretbewegungen (z. B. Sprints, Anstiege) oder die Verwendung von ovalen Kettenblättern bei der Leistungsberechnung und gewährleisten so eine Genauigkeit von ±1 % in jeder Situation.
Assioma PRO MX-2 bietet eine äußerst umfassende Datenauswertung über ANT+ und Bluetooth.

Die sichtbaren Daten sind:

  • Power
  • Kadenz
  • Links/Rechts-Balance
  • PCO (Platform Center Offset)
  • PP (Power Phase)
  • TE (Drehmoment-Effizienz)
  • PS (Trittfrequenz-Uniformität)
  • RP (Sitz-/Stehposition)

Echte, nicht geschätzte Links/Rechts-Balance-Daten

Die von Assioma PRO MX-2 gelieferten Daten basieren auf getrennten Messungen der rechten und linken Seite.Dies ermöglicht eine genaue Beobachtung nicht nur der Gesamtleistung, sondern auch der Links/Rechts-Balance, was zu einer realen und nicht geschätzten Datenauswertung führt.

Wiederaufladbar und umweltfreundlich

Assioma PRO MX verwendet integrierte wiederaufladbare Batterien: Eine einzige Ladung garantiert mindestens 60 Stunden Nutzung.

Das Aufladen erfolgt über ein magnetisches System, das Probleme durch versehentliches Ziehen am Ladekabel verhindert.

Hergestellt in Italien

Favero Electronics produziert jeden Leistungsmesser in Italien und testet ihn einzeln in sorgfältigen Labortests, die die Anforderungen der geltenden Normen mehr als erfüllen.

Spezifikationen

  • MTB- und Gravel-Pedale mit beidseitigem Leistungsmesser
  • Pedalgewicht mit Leistungsmesser: 191,4 g
  • Links/Rechts-Balance
  • Kadenzsensor: integriert
  • Gyroskop: integriert
  • Leistungsberechnungssystem: IAV (Instantaneous Angular Velocity-basiert)
  • Fahrraddynamik: Ja
  • Daten über ANT+ oder Favero Assioma App anzeigbar:
    • Power
    • Kadenz
    • Links/Rechts-Balance
    • PCO
    • Leistungsphase (PP)
    • Trittfrequenzeinheit (PS)
    • Drehmoment-Effizienz (TE)
    • Sitz-/Stehposition (nicht in Favero Assioma App)
  • Daten über Bluetooth anzeigbar:
    • Power
    • Kadenz
    • Links/Rechts-Balance
  • Kompatibel mit ovalen Kettenblättern: ja
  • Batterie: Lithium, wiederaufladbar
  • Batterielaufzeit: mindestens 60 Stunden
  • Funkkommunikation: ANT+, Bluetooth
  • Leistungsmessgenauigkeit: ± 1%
  • Temperaturkompensation: -10°C / +55°C
  • Schutzart: IP67
  • Stapelhöhe: 11,2 mm
  • Kompatible Klickpedale:
    • Mitgelieferte Klickpedale (Art. 773-00-62)
    • Shimano® SM-SH51 Klickpedale
  • Fahrradtyp: MTB XC, CX, Gravel
  • Hergestellt in Italien
  • Garantie: 2 Jahre

Lieferumfang

  • Linkes Pedal mit Leistungsmesser

  • Rechtes Pedal mit Leistungsmesser

  • MTB-Klickpedal-Kit kompatibel mit SPD®

  • 4 Unterlegscheiben

  • Magnetischer Anschluss (2x MX-2 | 1x MX-1)

  • 1 Y-Ladekabel mit zwei Micro-USB-Anschlüssen

  • 1 Schmierkit

  • 1 Garantie- und Sicherheitshandbuch

  • 1 Willkommensflyer

Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 90796483021

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.7 ★★★★★
Based on 735 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
C
Verified Purchase
christina graves
Dallas, US
★★★★★ 4
Ink is a problem
Printer is great. It prints very nicely.. had no problem setting up.. it all works fine. What I didn't like is the ink is kind of expensive and doesn't seem to last long. Once one color is out .. you can't use at all. Says "print in black" but it only allows that a few pages then it's done even tho there is black ink left. Epson customer service kind of sucks also.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on October 10, 2025
A
Verified Purchase
A. R. Masters
Dallas, US
★★★★★ 5
Correction: Excellent value, quality and ease of use for color & grey scale; Wi-Fi firmware updates
Straightforward to install on my home WiFi network. The controls and screen are easy to navigate. Firmware updates can be done via WiFi—so much better than downloading an installer to a computer. Surprised that the maximum borderless print size is A3+. I don’t care, because I don’t mind a thin border on 13x19” paper, and intend to print 12x18” or smaller anyway for framing. Good results on real-world test prints with default color and tonal settings in Apple Photos. Astonishingly, perfect color and tonal range in my full-spectrum, full-dynamic range test print of a storefront on 13x19” Matte paper. A garden scene had true hues—borderless on 4x6” glossy paper—but was a bit dark. You wouldn’t notice if you only saw the print. Full tonal range B&W image on glossy paper lost some highlight detail and mid-tone pop compared to what I got from a commercial print shop using Luster paper, but I’m not seeing a color cast reported by others, which is very good news. I bought Epson again after a long hiatus because 1) I have a big stock of paper from pre-covid days, 2) ink cost is not a problem for my limited photo printing needs, and 3) the recent price drop offered a very low up-front cost. This one is smaller and very much quieter than its predecessor. It offers Air Print connectivity, but I prefer WiFi, even from mobile devices. Pretty happy so far. Already useful and B&W may improve with experimentation.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on August 31, 2024
A
Verified Purchase
ASal27
San Leandro, US
★★★★★ 5
Beautiful, High-Quality Prints — A Great Photo Printer
I was looking for a good quality photo printer that could handle larger sizes, and this Epson XP-15000 really delivers. I’ve been so impressed with the print quality — the 13×19 prints come out beautifully: colorful, bold, and clean. Since it uses individual ink cartridges, it does go through ink pretty quickly, and buying all the separate cartridges isn’t cheap. But the results are worth it. The extra gray and red cartridges really make the colors stand out and give the prints a professional look. I’ve printed a number of images so far, and every single one has come out flawless. I’ve only had it a short time, but I’m extremely happy with it. Honestly, I do wish I had spent a little more and gotten the ET-8550 with the ink tank system, since it’s more cost-effective in the long run — but for what I paid, this printer still does an amazing job. If you’re looking for a printer for craft bags, chip bags, photo prints, stickers — this can handle it all beautifully. I’d definitely recommend it!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on July 4, 2025
J
Verified Purchase
J F Morris
Charlottesville, US
★★★★★ 5
Easy to set up, print quality is excellent.
I've always been an HP guy but the ink has become so expensive that now I've got no choice but to look at other options. We needed a large format printer that could handle card stock and this printer after much research fitted the bill. We've done quite a few prints the the quality is exceptional. Set up was easy. The printer comes with a CD and quick setup manual, however we needed to go the Epson website to download the actual software suite to be able to print for our needs. The default drivers from the Windows auto installer were not sufficient because we were printing to a custom size of cardstock. After installation of the Epson suite everything was easy and we were off and running very quickly. WIFI connectivity from the printer was easy, the only thing that we had an issue with was the update from the PC however we updated right from the printer screen on the actual printer and it worked flawlessly. The printer has the regular 4 color cartridges as well as a red and a grey. The prints came out with great color accuracy and quality. After a few full page prints the black ink capacity was going down faster so we will purchase extra black ink first just to have it on hand. Also have to say that the printer is very very quiet and we didn't realize it was finished on most of the prints. Highly recommended printer.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on June 27, 2025
K
Verified Purchase
Kyle H
Grantham, US
★★★★★ 5
A great phone...but compared to what?
Digital Storage Capacity: 128 GB, Color: Black
Tldr: Good phone for this price, noticeably better than older A13 and I wish more people would include context to their reviews. Glad I bought mine. I'm leaving a long and detailed review because I got tired of reading through reviews that seemed contradictory, or said something was "bad" but without any context. If I made a poor choice buying a phone I'd likely be stuck with it for some years. I'm hoping this helps others like myself who are reading the reviews. Ok, so the most important context is what phone I'm coming from over to the A17 5g. My old phone was Samsung A13 5g. My opinions of the new phone will be largely based on how they compare to the previous phone I used. So it's budget phone to budget phone, with the A17 having approximately 3-4ish years newer tech (or same tech but cheaper.) Both phones are being used on metro PCS (T mobile) network. So I've now had the A17 for exactly one week. I primarily use my phone for android auto, text, checking email, web browser, occasional YouTube and maybe once per week on some games. I don't use it for heavy loads like massive file transfers or rendering video. It's fairly light use overall. So far, the things I've been most pleased with are the screen and software/system layout. The screen has decent color and brightness and is MUCH better than the A13. Both screens claim to run at 90hz but the change from the old 270 PPI (I believe stands for pixel per inch or some equivalent) to 385 PPI feels massive. Much cleaner image from text to images. The change from LCD to AMOLED gives much better contrast with deeper colors. The software and system layout are a bit harder to describe in detail. It's more of a personal/ascetic preference. Things look and feel a lot cleaner. There are added optional features like side slide tabs to house shortcuts for certain apps. Another feature is top down swipe from the right for system shortcuts and from the left for notification, so they are smashed together. Another improvement, though less so than the screen and software changes, is in the speed and responsiveness of the phone. This one also needs to be put in context a bit. I'm sure some would complain about it while coming from a more expensive and technologically superior phone. I have my own bias, as I'm coming from an inferior phone which had over 3 years of use (slowing it down over time.) I also use it for mostly light tasks. That being said, I am pleased that the phone is noticeably more responsive than my old one. Most of the lagging happens on start up (goes away after a few mins while the phone is connecting a bunch of apps and putting out/requesting info like date/time/location.) When I booted it for the first time, that was the worst lag I had. It will also slow down if you have several apps running at the same time. I feel like that's obvious, but some people genuinely don't know that if you hit the home button to leave an app, you need to bring up multi view and actually swipe the box away to close it fully. If you never close apps and never restart your phone on occasion it WILL slow way down. While using the phone for max 1 or 2 things at time it runs perfectly fine, and is better than the A13. Battery life is good. I went from appx. 5000mAh to 5000mAh phones, so besides the slight degradation in the old phones battery life it should be the same. 5000mAh for my uses feels excellent overall. It can go for a full 2 days without charging. Charging speed itself seems improved, but that's never mattered too much for me so I can't comment much. Seems fine though, roughly 1.5h charge from mostly dead to full. That's using a 25w fast charger block and appropriate USB c cable. I didn't use the cable that came with the phone so I can't comment. It didn't come with a charger block, by design. Your mileage on charge speed will vary based on what you're using to charge the phone with. The phone can't charge at full speed if you're using a 5w charger from 15 years ago. I don't have much to say about the camera. I rarely take photos and when I do it's usually quick snap shots of paper instructions or to share location. I believe (though I'm not sure) the A13 was also 50mp front camera but either the the other 2 lenses have been upgraded or they improved the camera software, because pictures do look a bit cleaner. It's not night and day or anything, but it looks better to my eye. Camera is also faster to adjust light and contrast when first focusing on a object, as compared to the old A13. Build quality seems a little improved. They are both budget phones and how build quality "feels" is inherently subjective but to me it does seem a little better. A quick note on activating this new phone...this may only be an issue I personally had, but in case this helps someone else I'd like to include it. I had a bit of trouble switching my physical SIM card out of my old phone and into the new. The metro app was telling me the phone wouldn't be compatible unless I changed phone plans (which is BS.) I had to call customer service and they opted to use the eSiM feature, rather than swapping the physical Sim. I noticed they also used the new phones 2nd SIM number to activate it, while i had tried using first. If you're having trouble perhaps check the phones info from the settings menu, and then try eSIM activation using the 2nd address. It worked fine for me after this. Samsung has a quick transfer feature if your previous phone was a Samsung. It basically copies over everything from your old phone, including apps, pictures, contacts and even text message history ect. It took 3 or 4 attempts (it didn't want to connect and dropped the connection once at 30% complete.) Luckily if it disconnects part way through, it will pick up where it left off, without needing to restart. Once it finally had a stable connection it took me about 6 minutes, it will vary based on how much stuff you have to move over. You need to download an app to do the transfer, but it will prompt you and take you to it's link. Summery: I find it pretty impressive how nice this phone feels both compared to its older model and for its price point in general. I found it frustrating that people would say this part or that was crap or great, but without giving any context to what they based that opinion off of. In my opinion, based on how cheap this phone is and compared to its older model (A13) this is an awesome phone so far, being one week in. Screen is a big improvement, system software and layout is better (IMO) and they seem to be making incremental improvements to things like the camera and overall build. For this price point I find it really impressive what you actually get. If you're coming from an older mid range phone I expect it will either be inferior or about the same. If you're coming from another phone in the 200 range it should be decent to good. For less than 200 and for what I use it for though, I'm very happy I bought this phone.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 3, 2026

recommand products